I've been re-studying the books and have more insights to share soon. Please check back soon as I have more articles in the works!
A very interesting video was just released by Project Camelot. (The photo is only a still. Click this link to go to the actual video.)
I have been somewhat of a fan of the work of Camelot for a couple of years now due to the bravery and courage that it must take for the founders, Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy, to publicly post their interviews with various political and military whistleblowers. Both of these people have received threats to their lives since embarking on this work, and are doing us, the public, a huge service in the interest of Truth. I commend them for this courage and am very grateful for the many videos that Camelot has produced over the last three years.
This brings me to comment on this recent interview with Dr. Greer. Kerry's comment on this interview as posted on her blog reads:
We thank everyone who's written to us with their intelligent and perceptive comments about the questions debated: whether any ET visitors are other than friendly and benign, and whether the US government has ongoing relationships with any ET race. Dr Greer says no to both questions, and in the video we strongly challenged his publicly stated position.The entire interview, over an hour in length, was quite enlightening. Unfortunately, Kerry's constant need for interrupting her guests and not listening to their responses has reached a new height in this video, and shows that Dr. Greer's point of view is being only partially heard but completely misunderstood.
As humans, we cannot afford to simply assume that all ETs and/or interdimensional beings have only our best interests at heart.However, Dr. Greer is not, and has never, suggested that we turn a blind eye to whatever reality might confront us as the world-wide education and acceptance of ETs and other dimensions moves forward. What he IS clearly saying, and what Kerry doesn't seem able to see right now given her current vibrational state, is that dividing everything into positive and negative polarity, or Service to Others (STO) versus Service to Self (STS), is a continuation of the old way of viewing our reality, and is precisely the main problem we face as a species right now.
In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One. (1.5)Later, Ra reiterates this point:
The Law of One, though beyond the limitation of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only identity. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator. [Emphasis mine.] (4.20)So, while there may very well be hostile ETs "out there," the point Dr. Greer was politely trying to make over Kerry's continual emotional outbursts and interruptions was this: It is time to move toward a more wholistic view of our reality and rise above the compulsive need to label everything dualistically. This is not the same, however, as "ignoring reality" -- this is instead a transcending of, and perhaps a positive influence on, our current experience.
To begin to master the concept of mental disciplines it is necessary to examine the self. The polarity of your dimension must be internalized. Where you find patience within your mind you must consciously find the corresponding impatience and vice versa. Each thought a being has, has in its turn an antithesis. The disciplines of the mind involve, first of all, identifying both those things of which you approve and those things of which you disapprove within yourself, and then balancing each and every positive and negative charge with its equal. The mind contains all things. Therefore, you must discover this completeness within yourself. (5.2)So, rather than reacting in fear from within an "us versus them" point of view, Ra suggests that we look directly at those things which we label good and bad and balancing both with wisdom. Ra never negates the idea that there are so-called negative entities acting within our dimensions, but instead suggests that we focus more on our potential similarities rather than our differences. Further, the very act of fearing something helps to create the very circumstances one is attempting to avoid. If one doubts this, all one needs do is take a look at the VERY polarized comments from viewers posted under this video on the YouTube website.
We may note at this point while you ponder the possibility/probability vortices that although you have many, many items which cause distress and thus offer seeking and service opportunities, there is always one container in that store of peace, love, light, and joy. This vortex may be very small, but to turn one’s back upon it is to forget the infinite possibilities of the present moment. Could your planet polarize towards harmony in one fine, strong, moment of inspiration? Yes, my friends. It is not probable; but it is ever possible. (65.12)It's up to you, and it's up to me. Will we continue to argue and separate, or are we tired of the games enough to bring this whole thing Home now?
I have never considered myself psychic by any means, despite my being able to see faint lights flying around in my room at night. (See my July 20th post, "We Are Not Alone".) However, I did notice last night that these lights are becoming more clear. I noticed this while lying in bed last night, looking around in the dark.
This sudden "upgrade" in my ability to see these things seemed to begin about three days ago. I was walking by the doorway that leads to the bathroom. I happened to glance toward the floor of the bathroom when I saw a very distinct flash of light. It was localized, with no reflection from it being cast on either the carpet, walls, or anything else nearby. And unlike some of the other things I've caught moving past the corner of my eye, I was looking directly at this spot near the carpet when it flashed.
Of course, I looked everywhere for possible causes. I tried to duplicate it by repeating my own movements to see if it could have been caused by a piece of jewelry I had been wearing or a tea cup in my hand, etc., but I couldn't. And this time there was no doubt in my mind that I had seen this flash of light, and that it wasn't caused by some visual "trick of the light."
I thought to grab my digital camera and snapped a picture to see if anything would show up. And something did. A very faint orb, exactly in the same spot that I had just seen the flash of light. (Click for a larger view.)
It's a little hard to see, but on the original, two faint orbs can be seen near the carpet. The one on the right is in the exact spot that I had just seen the flash of light.
Here is an enlarged version with the contrast enhanced and circles around the orbs:
I'm not sure what this means, but it's intriguing.
I was contacted today by a person I haven't seen nor spoken with in many years. We were friends once, but our friendship had always been rather difficult due to a great deal of dysfunction in this other person's life, and my own admitted impatience in dealing with it. Over the years, this "friend" had, for all intents and purposes, shut me out of her life completely because of some perceived hurt. In the past, my eventual apologizing, regardless of whether I was actually wrong or not, was the standard procedure, at which point this "friend" would see fit to begin communicating with me again.
After the third time of being completely shut of out of this "friend's" life, I realized that I was basically being a doormat. This was about two or three years ago, and a great deal has changed since then. I let go of any hopes of this every growing into a meaningful friendship, and had no intentions of dealing with this person again.
Until today, when I got the inevitable email attempting to establish regular contact again.
As always, I turned to Ra, and found the following:
Our understanding of karma is that which may be called inertia. Those actions which are put into motion will continue using the ways of balancing until such time as the controlling or higher principle which you may liken unto your braking or stopping is invoked. This stoppage of the inertia of action may be called forgiveness. These two concepts are inseparable. (34.4)
Forgiveness is highly preferable because it stops karma. Have I forgiven this person? I believe so. I certainly don't harbor any ill-will toward her. I want to see her be happy and get over all her dysfunction (though that's unlikely to happen, unfortunately).
So, to forgive is one thing. To pick up a dysfunctional friendship because I happen to forgive this person is, I think, an entirely separate matter. It was clear from the email I received that the only reason for contact was to assuage her own guilt due to her own past actions. I'm discovering that one can forgive while still taking care of oneself, something I had a hard time with in years past. As Ra commented:
Healing is a process of acceptance, forgiveness, and, if possible, restitution. The restitution not being available in time/space, there are many among your peoples now attempting restitution while in the physical. (26.27)
The word "restitution" refers to restoring something to it's original state, i.e., a damaged friendship. So it's clear from this, at least to me, that forgiveness doesn't necessarily imply "turning the other cheek."
Any comments?
There is seemingly no end to the amount of knowledge that one gains by re-reading these books.
Something that I keep turning over and over in my mind are these comments by Ra:
Ra: I am Ra. The sphere upon which you dwell is third density in its beingness of mind/body/spirit complexes. It is now in a space/time continuum, fourth density. This is causing a somewhat difficult harvest.
Questioner: How does a third-density planet become a fourth density planet?
Ra: [...] The
fourth density is, as we have said, as regularized in its approach as
the striking of a clock upon the hour. The space/time of your solar
system has enabled this planetary sphere to spiral into space/time of a
different vibrational configuration. This causes the planetary sphere
to be able to be molded by these new distortions. However, the
thought-forms of your people during this transition period are such
that the mind/body/spirit complexes of both individual and societies
are scattered throughout the spectrum instead of becoming able to grasp
the needle, shall we say, and point the compass in one direction.
Thus,
the entry into the vibration of love, sometimes called by your people
the vibration of understanding, is not effective with your present
societal complex. Thus, the harvest shall be such that many will repeat
the third-density cycle. The energies of your Wanderers, your teachers,
and your adepts at this time are all bent upon increasing the harvest.
However, there are few to harvest. (13.22-23).
Ra seems to be saying that Earth now exists in the fourth density; yet we are, as humans, still of third density and are still third density beings. How is that possible?
Earlier in the text, Ra told us that beings in fourth density are not currently visible to us. Think about this. If we are living in fourth density now, then we are surrounded by beings who are, at this time, invisible to us.
Ra: I am Ra. The use of the word “normal” is one which befuddles the meaning of the question. Let us rephrase for clarity. The fourth density is, by choice, not visible to third density. It is possible for fourth density to be visible. However, it is not the choice of the fourth-density entity to be visible due to the necessity for concentration upon a rather difficult vibrational complex which is the third density you experience. (12.17)
Why is this important? Because it goes a long way toward explaining pictures like the one I took in my bedroom a couple of nights ago. (Click on the photo to enlarge it.)
I know there is a great deal of controversy right now surrounding the idea of "orbs" in photographs, but due to the fact that I have seen these lights flying around my room before taking the photograph is proof -- albeit to me only -- that these things are not dust, pollen, camera artifacts, bugs, etc.
Could this possibly be evidence of fourth density beings?
Recent Comments